Are you a male lawyer who finds a woman in your office particularly attractive? Are you weird enough to even contemplate secreting a camera under her desk and filming … whatever?
Well, it allegedly crossed the mind of this Atlanta tax lawyer, and he is accused of actually putting his thoughts into action.
Free legal advice: don’t do that.
The Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts has released a database that allows the public to see what number of cases were closed in each judicial district and by each of the trial judges in the state. The database allows searches by judicial district or by judge.
When a judge’s name is pulled up the reader can see how many cases were closed in the last fiscal year. One can also see a list of the judge’s case that went up on appeal during the year, but only if an opinion has already been issued. Unfortunately, to determine the judge’s reversal rate, you have to open and read each of the opinions.
This information is interesting, but can be misinterpreted. First, the statistics tell us nothing about the complexity of the cases handled by the judge. A judge may end up with a number of medical malpractice cases, all of which involve more motion practice than the typical car wreck case and which can consume days of trial time.
The horrible flooding in Nashville has delayed our printer’s ability to finish the 3rd edition of Day on Torts. It now looks like we will not be able to ship the book until May 28, 2010.
Day on Torts: Leading Cases in Tennessee Tort Law consists of a summary of the leading case on over 300 subjects in Tennessee tort law. The book also cites you to thousands of other cases to aid you in your research. As you can see from the Table of Contents, the book will give you readily access to current, definitive case law on topics of interest to every tort lawyer.
The book was written because I found that computerized legal research often makes it more difficult to find the leading case on a particular topic. Now, you can turn to the appropriate section of the book, find the leading case on the subject as of the date of publication, and the use computerized legal research to update the case law or expand your research as necessary.
You haven’t seen much about it in the press yet, but BP has the benefit of a cap that will probably limit its liability for the oil spill in the Gulf. Section 1004 of the Oil Pollution Act (OPA), passed into law in August 1990 after the Exxon Valdez incident, limits the liability of holders of leases or permits for offshore facilities to $75 million per spill, plus removal costs.
The Act also limits the liability for tank vessels larger than 3,000 gross tons to $1,200 per gross ton or $10 million, whichever is greater and the liability for responsible parties at onshore facilities and deepwater ports to $350 million per spill.
The Act also created the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. The primary source of revenue for the fund was a five-cents per barrel fee on imported and domestic oil. Collection of this fee ceased on December 31, 1994 due to a "sunset" provision in the law. Other revenue sources for the fund include interest on the fund, cost recovery from the parties responsible for the spills, and any fines or civil penalties collected. The Fund is administered by the U.S. Coast Guard’s National Pollution Funds Center (NPFC).
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is seeking the maximum civil penalty of $16.375 million against Toyota Motor Corporation for failing to notify the auto safety agency of the dangerous “sticky pedal” defect for at least four months, despite knowing of the potential risk to consumers. Approximately 2.3 million vehicles in the U.S. were recalled in late January for the sticky pedal defect. The penalty being sought against Toyota would be the largest civil penalty ever assessed against an auto manufacturer by NHTSA.
NHTSA learned through documents obtained from Toyota that the company knew of the sticky pedal defect since at least September 29, 2009. That day, Toyota issued repair procedures to their distributors in 31 European countries and Canada to address complaints of sticky accelerator pedals, sudden increases in engine RPM, and sudden vehicle acceleration. The documents also show that Toyota was aware that consumers in the United States were experiencing the same problems. Auto manufacturers are legally obligated to notify NHTSA within five business days if they determine that a safety defect exists. The reason NHTSA requires automobile manufacturers to notify the government of safety defects is to prevent the risk of harm to others. Prompt reporting, the theory goes, permits the government to order a recall if the manufacturer refuses to do so and give consumers a warning of the risk posed by the defect.
$16.375 million is a lot of money – but not to Toyota. Last year Toyota’s revenues exceeded $200 billion. It has assets of some $300 billion and its shareholder equity exceeds $100 billion. If it agrees to pay the fine of $16.375 million, or the fine is upheld by a court, the fine will amount to .000081875% of its revenue last year.
Dan Pollitt, a law professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law, has died at the age of 88.
Professor Pollitt was my Constitutional Law professor and, as explained in this obituary, he spent "a lifetime of defending civil rights, civil liberties, and fighting injustices in local, state and national arenas." He was an unabashed progressive, a man who believed that the law should be an instrument of social change.
He worked on behalf of the poor and organized labor caused many to dislike him. I recall a job interview I had in the Fall of 1979 with a big firm. I was asked who my Con Law professor was and I replied "Dan Pollit." The interviewer said (and I am not kidding) "You can’t learn constitutional law from that communist." That was an easy job offer to turn down.
AAJ’s upcoming seminar Litigating Medical Negligence and Injured Infant Cases, April 9–10 at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas, will provide the newest strategies and techniques on how to get justice for those who need it the most.
To register and learn more, visit www.justice.org/education/medneg or call AAJ Education at 800-622-1791 or 202-965-3500, ext. 8612.
AAJ’s upcoming seminar Growing on the Vine: Maximizing Profitability in Changing Times (cosponsored by AAJ’s Sole Practitioner and Small Firm Section) is about the business of running a successful law practice. The program is taking place April 9–10 at Caesars Place in Las Vegas. Program highlights include “Controlling Cost and Maximizing Revenue”, “Electronic Medical Research”, and “Technology at Trial—Cutting Costs Not Corners”, all of which are designed to help you run your firm more effectively and efficiently.
For more information and to register visit www.justice.org/education/growingonthevine or call the education department at (800) 622-1791.
Former ATLA President Howard Twiggs has died. Funeral services are today. Howard has been a friend for over 25 years and was a leader in the plaintiff’s trial bar and his community.
I first met Howard at a NCATL seminar in Chapel Hill, NC when I was still a law student. Later, we became re-acquainted at ATLA conventions and meetings around the country. About 12 years ago we had the pleasure of working on a case together, helping a North Carolina family that had a tragic accident on I-40 near Lebanon, TN. Thus, we had time to get to know one another in a long car rides and over dinner in my home, as opposed to simply running into each other at a reception at convention or two.
I say all of that to say this: Howard Twiggs was a very, very fine man and an extremely competent lawyer. He had a love for his fellow man, and felt duty-bound to help them, especially those who were not blessed with his intellect and his health. He loved his adopted state of North Carolina, and had that wonderful accent that always took me back 1978, when I left WI and jumped into life in the South.
Trey Mills is angry at Allstate. He explains why on his South Carolina Injury Law Journal blog.
Day on Torts