This decision from a federal judge in Pennsylvania will cause excitement throughout the tort bar: he ruled for a plaintiff who worked to protect assets from a claimed ERISA subrogation interest by having the proceeds of a settlement go from the defendant to a special needs trust.
Law.com published this article about the decision from Judge John P. Fullam. The article does a nice job of explaining the articles put forward by all parties.
If you want to read the full decision in Mills v. London Grove Township, 2005-00122 (July 19, 2007), click here.