Close

Articles Posted in Motor Vehicle Cases

Updated:

Evidence of car accident occurring not enough to support negligence claim.

Where defendant driver stated that the accident that injured plaintiff passenger was due to her swerving to avoid a wild animal that unexpectedly entered the roadway, and plaintiff “presented no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant,” summary judgment for defendant was affirmed by the Tennessee Court of…

Updated:

Defendant had no duty to remove tire debris from interstate after blowout.

Where defendant was driving a truck that had a blowout on the interstate, defendant did not have a duty to remove the tire debris from the road. In Walker v. McMillin, No. M2020-01507-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 420666 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2022), plaintiff was injured in a one-car accident caused…

Updated:

$1.5M Verdict Affirmed in Tennessee Car Wreck Case.

Where there was material evidence to support the jury’s verdict of more than $1.5 million in a car accident case, the verdict was affirmed. In Malone v. ASF Intermodal LLC, No. W2020-00430-COA-R3-CV, 2022 WL 353697 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 7, 2022), plaintiff was in a car accident caused by an…

Updated:

Involuntary dismissal affirmed when video showed that defendant’s car was visible when plaintiff pulled onto roadway.

Where security camera footage showed that plaintiff pulled onto the road when defendant’s approaching vehicle was clearly visible, plaintiff was at least 50% at fault for the resulting car accident, despite the fact that defendant was going at least twenty miles per hour over the speed limit. In Cryer v.…

Updated:

Jury verdict affirmed where jury believed defendant’s account of car accident.

Where plaintiff and defendant offered conflicting testimony regarding what caused a car accident, and the jury credited defendant’s testimony and found defendant not at fault, the verdict was affirmed. In Justice v. Hyatt, No. M2019-02105-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. June 30, 2021), plaintiff was driving his truck with his friend in…

Updated:

Tennessee “Discovery Rule” Applied to Vehicle Crash Case

Where plaintiff knew her husband was killed in a car accident with a firefighter but did not know all the details regarding how the accident occurred, the one-year statute of limitations began to run on the day of the crash and her GTLA suit that was filed more than one…

Updated:

Savings statute available to vicarious liability plaintiff.

When a plaintiff takes a voluntary nonsuit in a case asserting vicarious liability against an employer for its employee’s negligence, that plaintiff can re-file pursuant to the savings statute, even if the employee was voluntarily dismissed from the first case. In Helyukh v. Buddy Head Livestock & Trucking, Inc., No.…

Updated:

Arbitration Right in Underinsured Motorist Statute Not Triggered

When a person allegedly liable for the injury of a claimant “offers the limits of all liability insurance policies available to the party,” the Uninsured Motorist (UIM) statute provides an avenue through which the claimant may accept the offer but also “preserve the right to seek additional compensation from his…

Contact Us