Close

Day on Torts

Updated:

The Common Fund Doctrine and Med Pay Claims

The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals has ruled that the common fund doctrine applies to the determination of the payment of attorneys’ fees when monies for payments made under  medical payments coverage are collected in a personal injury case.  In Mitchell v. State Farm, No 2100184 (Ala. Civ. App.  10/7/11),…

Updated:

Tennessee’s New Dog Bite Law Protects Motorcyclists, Too.

The old "every dog gets one free bite" rule was severely limited as a result of legislation enacted by the Tennessee General Assembly several years ago.  In fact, the new law works to protect motorcyclists and bicyclists, too.  Here are the new rules: 44-8-413.  Civil liability for injury caused by dogs. …

Updated:

What Is Going Wrong With Patient Safety in Health Care?

The Doctor’s Company sells medical malpractice insurance to doctors.  In 2010, it conducted  525 patient safety site surveys. The surveys  were conducted across a range of practice environments around the country—from small office practices to large integrated delivery systems, hospitals, and outpatient facilities, such as surgery centers. The survey found…

Updated:

He Killed His Momma But Is Permitted to Sue His Psychiatrist?

Sounds outrageous, doesn’t it?  A guy  kills his mother and then the Georgia Supreme Court says he has a right to sue his psychiatrist for inappropriate psychiatric treatment that gave rise to the death of his mother.   It is outrageous only if you know nothing about either law or…

Updated:

What Would The State Of Tennessee’s Liability Be If The Indiana State Fair Tragedy Happened in Nashville?

There has been lots of discussion about those responsible for the tragedy that occurred on August 13, 2011 at the Indiana State Fair, where multiple people died and many others were injured after a stage collapsed at a concert.  At last count, seven people died and another 40 people were…

Updated:

Insurance Agent: Professional or Salesperson?

The California Court of Appeals explored the issue of the responsibility of an insurance agent is the case of Williams v. Hilb, Rogal & Hobbs Ins. Services of California, Inc., 177 Cal.App.4th 624, 98 Cal.Rptr.3d 910 (2nd Dist. 2009). Insurance agents like to argue that they do not have a duty to…

Updated:

CCL Wins Victory in Louisana – Med Mal Damages Caps Declared Unconstitutional

  AAJ received good news today regarding a case that was argued in the 14th Judicial District Court of Louisiana by the Center for Constitutional Litigation and Louisiana lawyer Oliver Schrumpf. CCL has worked on the case (Arrington v. Galen-Med, Inc.) for about four years, with support from AAJ and…

Contact Us