An award for future medical expenses in a personal injury claim under Tennessee law may be appropriate even where the plaintiff does not establish with “absolute certainty” that the future treatment will be pursued, as the standard for such an award is “reasonable certainty.” In Kirby v. Memphis Light Gas…
Day on Torts
Corporations as “People:” How The Legal Fiction Arose
An interesting article in The Atlantic about how the law came to treat corporations as people. An excerpt: Somewhat unintuitively, American corporations today enjoy many of the same rights as American citizens. Both, for instance, are entitled to the freedom of speech and the freedom of religion. How exactly did corporations come…
Pre-Suit Notice by Personal Delivery Must Actually Be Delivered to Comply with HCLA.
When an HCLA plaintiff decides to serve pre-suit notice via personal service, such service must actually be completed in accordance with the statute in order for the plaintiff to take advantage of the 120-day extension of the statute of limitations. In Webb v. Magee, No. 2018-01305-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. April…
Slight Raise of Pavement Along Crack in Parking Lot – Case Dismissed
Where a plaintiff tripped on a crack in a parking lot that was 54 feet long and resulted in a height deviation of no more than 1.5 inches, the property owner owed no duty to plaintiff and summary judgment in a premises liability case was affirmed. In Shaw v. Metropolitan…
Sanctions Affirmed in Tennessee Slander Case
Where a plaintiff continued to pursue a defamation case even after depositions revealed that the allegedly defamatory statements were only made to two of plaintiffs’ friends and the statements did not change their opinion of plaintiff, Rule 11 sanctions against plaintiff were affirmed. In McMillin v. Realty Executives Associates, Inc.,…
Gym Not Liable for Sexual Assault in Locker Room
Where a plaintiff claiming that he was sexually assaulted in a locker room failed to present any evidence that the “health club knew or should have known of prior assaults by the assailant or anyone else,” summary judgment for defendant health club was affirmed. In Boswell v. Young Men’s Christian…
City’s Duty to Protect Against Dangerous Dog Fell Under Public Duty Doctrine
A plaintiff’s claim that the city had a duty to protect her against a dog owned by another citizen fell under the public duty doctrine, and summary judgment for defendant city was thus affirmed. In Fleming v. City of Memphis, No. W2018-00984-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Mar. 5, 2019), plaintiff filed…
Plaintiff Must Name “John Doe” if Other Driver in Car Accident Case is Unknown.
In order to bring a direct claim against a plaintiff’s uninsured motorist insurance carrier, the plaintiff must have filed his initial complaint against the uninsured motorist (or “John Doe” if unknown) within the one-year statute of limitations. In Fults v. MetLife Auto & Home Insurance Agency, Inc., No. M2018-00647-COA-R3-CV (Tenn.…
Claims Commissioner Must Make Conclusions of Law For Each Theory of Negligence
Where the Claims Commissioner’s ruling for defendant on a negligence suit did not include conclusions of law regarding both of plaintiffs’ theories, the order of dismissal was deemed deficient and was vacated by the Court of Appeals. In Kim v. State, No. W2018-00762-COA-R3-CV (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 26, 2019),…
Rule 59.04 Motion Does Not to Save Medical Malpractice Case
A nurse who worked in an administrative capacity in the year preceding an incident underlying an HCLA claim may not be qualified to give expert testimony in the case. A Rule 59.04 motion did not cure the deficiency in the initial affidavit. In Smith v. Methodist Hospitals of Memphis, No.…